According to sources, “DGGI has summoned Indian
offices of Maersk, Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd, Hapag Lloyd, MSC –
Mediterranean Shipping Company, CMA CGM SA, One Ocean Network Express, Pacific
International Line, Regional Container Lines, Samudera Shipping Line Ltd, Korea
Marine Transport Co Ltd, Milaha Integrated Maritime & Logistics, Wan Hi
Lines Ltd, TS Lines Co Ltd, Sinokor India Pvt Ltd, Xpress Feeders, Yang Ming
India Pvt LTD, Zim Container Lines etc.”
“All
of these foreign shipping lines have been alleged by DGGI for not paying
legitimate taxes due, and evasion has been detected on account of import of
services from head office by Indian branch offices,” sources
said.
Currently detailed clarifications have been sought by
DGGI and the officers are in talks with all these foreign shipping lines,
sources added.
Furthermore, the sources said, DGGI – the
investigative arm under GST regime – alleges that foreign shipping lines
‘headquartered abroad have a branch offices in India which has been billing
services including rental, maintenance of aircrafts, crew salary etc abroad.
Thus, these services coming from abroad were liable to GST under reverse charge
mechanism, which these shipping lines have not paid.”
The investigations have been carried out by DGGI Ahmedabad and Mumbai zones,
sources said.
All
these shipping lines have been under scanner since October 2023.
“The method employed by the DGGI, notably the issuance
of summons in these scenarios, brings up concerns regarding its alignment with
recognized protocols and legal standards. Typically, the adjudication process
entails the dispatch of formal notifications, followed by comprehensive
information collection and examination, culminating in a justified decision
that reflects the unique aspects and strengths of each case. Despite numerous
precedents and guidelines on this topic, the DGGI continues to send notices to
multinational companies. The guidance
provided by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs has not
significantly assisted the industry, leading to the belief that only a verdict
from the highest court could resolve this issue definitively.”