A climate policy at
the global level to tackle warming might be strongly backed by public, a study
has claimed. Global carbon pricing,
coupled with a system of redistributing the revenues — either among citizens or
for investing in mitigating climate change -— is considered by economists as a
‘reference climate policy’ as it can both reduce emissions and promote equity.
Co-authored by researchers at the Potsdam Institute
for Climate Impact Research, Germany, the study, in 2021, surveyed over 40,000
people from 20 countries, which account for about three-quarters of the global
carbon emissions. The team found a
“strong and genuine” support for global climate policy, with 70 per cent people
favouring it in the US and 94 per cent in Japan. The findings, published in the
journal Nature Human Behaviour, also showed that respondents backed policies,
including a global carbon pricing scheme, in which the remaining global
emissions budget — how much can we emit more before we breach 2 degrees Celsius
warming — is divided according to population, with countries receiving emission
rights they can trade.
“We were pleasantly surprised by the results.
Politicians should not be too afraid of citizens when pushing ahead with global
climate protection,” co-author Linus Mattauch, head of societal transition and
well-being research group at Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, said.
A second survey, conducted in 2023 among 8,000
people in the US and European Union, showed that the respondents supported a
concrete timeline for carbon pricing — with, for example, $90 per tonne of
carbon dioxide in 2030, and a per capita reimbursement of $30 per month for
every adult worldwide. This would be a
substantial financial inflow to the Global South, where per capita carbon
emissions are relatively low and where 30 dollars has more purchasing power
than in the wealthy Global North, researchers said.
They added that
three-quarters of the participants in the EU, and more than half in the US,
expressed support for the idea, despite understanding that their own country
might incur a financial loss under these conditions. “When asked ‘At which
level(s) do you think public policies to tackle climate change need to be put
in place? 70 per cent (in the US) to 94 per cent (in Japan) choose the global
level,” the authors wrote. “Three quarters of Europeans and half of
Americans support the GCS (global climate scheme), even as they understand its
cost to them,” they wrote.
Lead author Adrien Fabre, from the International
Research Center on the Environment and Development (CIRED), France, said,
“Against this backdrop, the question is why the international community is not
making faster progress.” “How misunderstandings and misperceptions arise in
public discourse, and what role interest groups play is yet unclear. Perhaps
the boundaries of what is considered realistic are shifting. Our work could
contribute to this,” Fabre added.