It remains one of
the most common rants among the world’s seafarers – why aren’t they more
engaged in the design of ships, the very places they live, breathe, and work
for months on end? Carl Martin Faannessen, CEO of crew manager Noatun
Maritime, doesn’t hesitate. “It remains a mystery why this is not part and
parcel in every program to design a new vessel-type or a newbuild-program,” he
says. “Many owners do take the crew into the projects, but there is room to
improve on this across the industry.”
That call for
better integration of seafarer insight into naval architecture is echoing
louder than ever across the industry. From the bridge to the engine room, those
who know ships best argue they should have a seat at the design table — not as
an afterthought, but as an essential part of how ships are conceived. For Steven Jones, founder of the Seafarers Happiness Index, the logic is
obvious. “From performance to living
conditions, the idea that ships are designed and built without user input seems
utterly ridiculous,” he says. “From ergonomics to functionality, to the testing
conditions of crew living and working together — we can do better. We must do
better, and that will need experiential insights. The kind that can only come
from those who sail.”
Captain Tanuj Balani, director at Indian compliance
specialist Stag Marine, agrees. “Designers sitting in offices often overlook
ergonomics, workflow, and situational awareness that only seafarers
experience,” he says. “It’s one thing to
see a bridge layout on paper; it’s another to live with it during a storm.” This growing frustration stems from a simple
truth: too many ships are still built for cargo, compliance, or cost — not for
the humans who operate them.
At V.Group, one of the world’s largest
shipmanagers, Allan Falkenberg, the firm’s chief operating officer of HR
marine,.. “Crew live and breathe every aspect of a vessel and have invaluable
insights on how ships can be better designed for both comfort and performance,”
he says...Falkenberg notes. “When
crew are spending months onboard in the same environment, these lived experiences matter.”
Few owners have taken this issue as seriously as Eastern Pacific
Shipping (EPS). The Singapore-based
giant has been rethinking shipboard life through its Life-at-Sea Programme,
which CEO Cyril Ducau says is “designed to close the gap between sea and
shore.” “By
reimagining shipboard life through physical, mental, and digital wellbeing, we
aim to make every EPS vessel a true home at sea.” Dutch owner Karin Orsel, CEO of MF Shipping
Group, fully agrees. nvaluable insights into usability, ergonomics, safety, and
efficiency,” she says. “Incorporating their feedback leads to safer, more
practical, and higher-performing ships.”
At Stella Maris, a
leading maritime welfare charity, CEO Tim Hill views seafarer input as a moral
as well as operational necessity...From a shipmanagement standpoint, Manpreet Gandhi, marine director at
Ishima, the d’Amico Group’s in-house manager, says his teams are already doing
it...“...At RINA, the Italian
classification society, Brian Yam, a director, says...“Seafarers’ operational insights
are invaluable...For Wiebke Schuett,
vice president for marine personnel at Wilhelmsen Ship Management, the logic is
equally clear. “It’s always valuable to get the end-user perspective,” she
says...Looking ahead, Andrew Airey, managing director at Highland Maritime,
offers a technological path forward. “It is now much easier to do this with the
use of 3D digital design modelling and VR – virtual reality immersion,
observation and testing of vessel design, provided you actually utilise current
sea staff in the process,” he explains to Splash...
Now, with digital
tools, welfare awareness, and a younger, more vocal generation of seafarers,
that imbalance can finally be corrected.