A new study by EY
Greece has warned that shipping’s transition to net zero will be uneven and
capital intensive, constrained by factors including alternative fuel
availability, infrastructure, shipyard capacity, access to finance and
fragmented commercial incentives.
Responding to the
report, BAR Technologies said that while the industry is right to plan for
long-term fuel pathways, too much of the decarbonisation debate remains focused
on what may become available in the future rather than what can be deployed
now.
The EY study
identifies energy efficiency and operational measures as among the most
practical near-term actions available to shipping. BAR Technologies argues that
wind propulsion, already delivering measurable fuel and emissions savings on
commercial vessels, must be recognised as a proven part of that immediate
response.
Wind propulsion has
also passed an important market milestone. According to the International
Windship Association, more than 100 large commercial cargo ships, representing
over five million tonnes of deadweight capacity, are now equipped to harness
wind power. That is almost five times the number recorded in May 2022, clear
evidence that the technology is moving into the commercial mainstream. BAR
Technologies are playing a significant part in this transition: By the end of
2026, 10 vessels will be operating with 23 WindWings® installed,
giving a combined saving of approximately 100t of CO2 per day.
John Cooper, CEO of
BAR Technologies, said: “Shipping needs to stop treating decarbonisation as
something that only begins when future fuels arrive or every detail of the
IMO’s Net-Zero Framework is settled. The industry cannot allow the absence of
perfect policy certainty to become an excuse for inaction. Proven technologies
are available now, and owners can act today.”
Cooper continued:
“Wind propulsion is not waiting to be invented or proven. It is already
operating on commercial vessels and reducing the amount of fuel they need. The
priority now should be to remove the barriers preventing more owners from
investing.”
For wind
propulsion, those barriers are increasingly commercial and financial rather
than technical.
Under many
chartering arrangements, the owner funds the technology while the charterer
receives much of the benefit through lower fuel consumption. Until charterparty
structures allow the costs, risks and savings to be shared more effectively,
owners can be left carrying the investment and long-term performance risk.
Access to finance
is another significant constraint. Without competitive green lending or blended
finance, owners may have to fund emissions-reduction technology at conventional
commercial borrowing rates. This can lengthen the payback period, particularly
in the tramp, bulk and tanker markets, where routes, earnings and charter
durations are less predictable.
Cooper added: “But
the real way to unlock action now is to make green investment affordable.
Shipowners need access to financing that makes proven emissions-reduction
technologies commercially viable today, not at some point in the future. If we
can lower the cost of capital and create funding structures that recognise both
the fuel savings and the environmental value these technologies deliver, far
more owners will be able to invest.
“Wind propulsion has
already passed the technology test. Affordable finance, alongside charterparty
structures that share the benefits fairly, is what will unlock deployment at
scale.”