The long-awaited plan floated the idea to, “Impose a universal
infrastructure or security fee on all foreign-built commercial vessels calling
at US ports, to be assessed on the weight of the imported tonnage arriving on
the vessel.”
The concept is not dissimilar to the US Trade Representative (USTR)
fee imposed on Chinese-built vessels briefly in October last
year, before being suspended for a 12-month period in November.
The proposed fee on all foreign-built vessels calling the US ranges 1
cent – 25 cents per kilogram yielding an estimated $66 billion - $1.5 trillion
over 10 years that be used for a Maritime Security Fund.
The ICS said that it supported the US’
ambition of increasing its shipbuilding capacity and industry but opposed the
levying of fees on international shipping.
“ICS remains opposed to any proposed port
fees, including the suggested universal infrastructure or security fee on
foreign-built commercial vessels calling at US ports,” the shipowner
representative body stated.
“The imposition of fees based on the
weight of imported tonnage, at levels ranging from 1 cent per kilogram to 25
cents per kilogram, would represent a substantial additional cost burden on
maritime transport. Such measures risk distorting trade, increasing costs for
US consumers and businesses, disrupting the smooth flow of global commerce, and
could encourage retaliatory measures.”
It added that the global nature of maritime trade required carefully
coordinated solutions that avoid unintended consequences.
“ICS remains committed to working
constructively with the US Administration, as well as international partners,
to support policies that strengthen maritime capacity while safeguarding the
efficiency and integrity of global trade,” it said.