Chief Minister V D Satheesan
on Wednesday (1 July) said the Adani
Group has not sought the state government’s permission for the proposed
transfer of a 49% stake in the Vizhinjam International Seaport to Mediterranean
Shipping Company (MSC), asserting that such approval is mandatory under the
project’s concession agreement.
Satheesan told the state assembly during question hour that the
government learnt about MSC’s proposed acquisition — involving an investment of
Rs 13,000 crore — only through media reports. “No file seeking approval for the
share transfer has come before the government so far. We would examine the
proposal if and when such a request is submitted,” he said. The Chief Minister said any share transfer
requires the state’s approval and, in certain cases, clearance from the Union
government as well. Referring to the concession agreement governing the
project, Satheesan said Clause 5(3) stipulates that prior approval of the state
government is mandatory for any transfer of shares, and that any transfer
carried out without such approval would have no legal validity.
He
noted a key distinction in thresholds: while the Companies Act generally treats
transfer of more than 75% of shares as a change in ownership, the concession
agreement sets the threshold at 25%. As the Government of Kerala is the designated
authority under the agreement, no change in ownership can take effect without
its prior approval, he said.
Replying to a submission moved
by Leader of the Opposition Pinarayi Vijayan, Satheesan said the government
will decide on the proposed share transfer based on five parameters: National security; safeguarding public
interest through a common-user facility; ensuring fair competition; promoting
equal investment opportunities for all companies and long-term development of
Vizhinjam Port, including off-port activities and their impact on the state’s
revenue Only after examining all these
aspects would the government consider granting approval, he said.
Satheesan
added that MSC is not merely a financial investor but one of the world’s
largest container shipping companies, and that the government will therefore
examine how the company plans to use its investment and whether its entry could
influence the port’s operations. Pinarayi expressed concern over the
proposed share transfer, saying Vizhinjam was envisioned as a world-class
multi-operator port, but the proposed transaction could pave the way for
monopolisation by a single shipping company. If that happens, he said, the port
would lose both its multi-operator and multi-client character, leaving
exporters dependent on a single company’s vessels and freight rates. Pinarayi
urged the government to examine whether the proposed financial arrangement
could artificially reduce the state’s revenue share from the port from 2035
onwards. He noted that the previous government had signed MoUs worth Rs 5,000
crore with public sector undertakings such as the Container Corporation of
India (CONCOR) and Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC), warning that a single
company gaining effective control of the port could undermine the growth
prospects of these entities as well as other logistics firms. He urged the
government not to permit any move that could lead to monopolisation of the port.
Meanwhile,
Adani Group officials told TNIE that due procedures had been followed in the
proposed sale of a 49% minority stake in its operating subsidiary, Adani
Vizhinjam Port Private Limited (AVPPL), to MSC. The divestment, they said, is
fully in line with the group’s contractual rights and remains subject to
statutory approvals from the state and Union governments. According
to the officials, the concession agreement requires Adani Ports to retain at
least a 51% stake during the construction phase and the first year of
commercial operations. Thereafter, it is required to hold a minimum 26% stake,
allowing it to divest the remaining shares with government approval. They added
that, under the agreement, the Adani Group can legally divest up to 74% of its
stake two years after the port’s formal commissioning. The officials also
defended the group’s decision to notify market regulator SEBI before formally
informing the state government. “Under regulatory requirements, we are legally
bound to notify SEBI first and make a public disclosure. After that we will
formally intimate the state and Union governments. The transaction will
materialise only after obtaining their explicit approvals,” a company source
said, adding that preparations were under way to formally inform the government
and that the entire process is expected to take three to five months to
conclude.