Maersk waives ‘Disruption Surcharge’ for Red Sea sailings on India–U.S. East Coast trade

The surcharge was earlier introduced to offset higher operating costs arising from vessel diversions around the Cape of Good Hope, following security risks in the Red Sea that forced carriers to avoid the Suez Canal. These diversions led to longer transit times, increased fuel consumption and higher operational expenses.

With the latest move, Maersk has withdrawn the additional charge for India–USEC sailings routed via the Red Sea disruption alternative, signalling a recalibration of its pricing strategy as market conditions evolve.

Industry stakeholders say the waiver will ease freight costs for Indian exporters and importers trading with the U.S. East Coast, particularly in sectors such as engineering goods, textiles, chemicals and consumer products, which rely heavily on containerised shipping.

The decision also reflects softening freight rates and competitive pressure on major east–west trade lanes, as carriers adjust to demand patterns and improved capacity management.

Maersk’s move could influence other global carriers to reassess similar surcharges introduced during the peak of the Red Sea crisis. While vessels continue to avoid the Suez Canal due to security concerns, shipping lines are increasingly absorbing part of the additional costs rather than passing them fully on to customers.

The Red Sea disruptions, which began in late 2023, had significantly impacted global supply chains, forcing rerouting on Asia–Europe and Asia–U.S. trades and leading to higher freight rates and surcharges across markets.

For now, Maersk’s decision to waive the disruption surcharge is being welcomed by the trade as a positive step toward cost normalisation on the strategically important India–USEC corridor.