At the centre of the debate is the IMO’s 2023
greenhouse gas reduction strategy, which commits international shipping to
reach net zero emissions by or around 2050. That objective continues to command
broad support. Member states reiterated their support for a global solution,
recognising that only an IMO-led framework offers the opportunity for unified
international regulations.
But agreement on what form this could take, or when it will arrive, remains
elusive. The Net Zero Framework, as approved at MEPC 83 and originally expected
to underpin the transition, remains under consideration after adoption stalled
in 2025. However, this is not simply procedural delay and reflects a fundamental
divide within the IMO. Some governments support a system built on firm targets,
carbon pricing and centrally administered mechanisms. Others favour a more
flexible approach, where compliance reflects fuel availability and market
readiness. The debate over a mooted global fund, seen by some as a carbon tax,
remains a key sticking point.
For shipowners and operators, this uncertainty has
practical consequences. Investment decisions on fuels, newbuilds and retrofits
will be challenging in the absence of stable, long-term regulatory signals.
This could pose a problem if waiting for regulatory clarity makes future
compliance more difficult. Despite this uncertainty, much of the industry
presses ahead to order more efficient tonnage while adopting or piloting new
technologies. While political consensus remains elusive, technical development moves
steadily ahead. MEPC 84 showed a clear separation between the politics of
decarbonisation and how the engineering will work in practice. Central to the shift towards net
zero is the concept of greenhouse gas fuel intensity. All regulatory proposals
under discussion revolve around measuring emissions on a lifecycle, or
well-to-wake, basis. This has far-reaching implications for fuel strategy as it
places equal emphasis the production of fuels as the consumption of those fuels
at sea. For shipowners this introduces a new layer of complexity. Choosing a
fuel is about more than onboard performance or cost. The origin of the
fuel, the energy used in its production and the wider supply chain all become
part of the equation. Future
competitiveness will depend on adopting new fuels while understanding their
underlying carbon intensity. Two similar fuels may carry very different
lifecycle emissions depending on how they are produced and transported to the
ship.
It seems unlikely that the transition to net zero shipping will be
driven by a single technology or fuel. Instead, it will be shaped by a
combination of efficiency, fuel innovation and data-driven optimisation across
the entire energy chain. Work to
advance the IMO’s life cycle assessment framework leaves some key questions
unresolved. Methodologies to calculate emissions, the treatment of methane
slip, and the challenge of defining representative emission factors across
different regions all continue to divide opinion. The
ways in which emissions are measured is also evolving. MEPC 84 adopted new
guidelines for monitoring methane and nitrous oxide emissions, including engine
load monitoring and continuous emissions monitoring systems, enabling operators
to capture emissions data in real time.
This represents a structural shift in the regulation of
decarbonisation. The industry appears to
be moving towards a model where emissions will be continuously measured,
transparently reported and consistently verified. Instead of relying on
design standards or fuel specifications, future frameworks will use emissions
data based on actual performance. For
operators this would change the conversation. Compliance would be no longer be about meeting a regulatory threshold
on paper but showing how a vessel performs day in and day out. That places much
greater emphasis on operational efficiency, digital monitoring and onboard
systems capable of delivering reliable emissions data. This approach also shows that reducing
fuel consumption remains one of the most effective ways to cut emissions.
Efficiency measures, whether through operational optimisation or technologies
such as wind assistance, will continue to play a central role alongside the
fuel transition.
The takeaways of MEPC 84 point to an industry in transition, even as the final
shape of global regulation continues to evolve. The challenge is how and when
different parts of the sector can reach net zero through credible, practical
and commercially viable pathways.
For the maritime sector, that means avoiding a one-size-fits-all view of
decarbonisation. Bulk carriers, tankers, container ships and specialist vessels
will not all follow the same route. Progress will depend on combining
efficiency gains, fuel flexibility, lifecycle emissions data and technologies
suited to each operating profile.
Regardless of the final regulatory framework, owners and operators that
invest early in efficiency, emissions transparency and fuel flexibility are
likely to be better positioned for long-term competitiveness.