Speaking at a
workshop in Mumbai on June 5 to review the implementation of BMIP, Debasish
Prusty, Additional Secretary, Department of Financial Services, Ministry of
Finance, said the pool had issued 85 policies within less than a month of its
launch on May 12, covering cargo war risk and hull war risk. According to
Prusty, BMIP has already delivered significant savings to the shipping
industry, with premiums for hull war risk declining by around 27 per cent and
cargo war risk premiums falling by nearly 48 per cent compared to pre-conflict
levels. However, while war risk policies have seen strong uptake, Protection
and Indemnity (P&I) cover has attracted limited participation so far.
Prusty urged industry stakeholders to identify barriers preventing wider
adoption of P&I policies through the pool and suggested exploring a
regulatory framework that could support the development of a domestic P&I ecosystem.
P&I insurance covers third-party liabilities
arising from ship operations, including oil pollution, wreck removal, cargo
claims, crew liabilities and damage to port infrastructure. Globally, such
risks are primarily insured through the International Group of Protection and
Indemnity Clubs (IG Clubs), a London-based association of 12 mutual insurers
that provide liability cover for approximately 90 per cent of the world’s
ocean-going fleet by tonnage.
Prusty proposed
that India initially focus on building domestic P&I capacity for coastal
and harbour risks before expanding coverage to ocean-going vessels. He also
suggested leveraging the Maritime Development Fund (MDF) to support the
capitalisation of a domestic P&I entity. “Can we have an IRDAI-licensed fixed
premium P&I insurance product for Indian coastal and harbour risks? Can we
think of leveraging the Maritime Development Fund for capitalising a domestic
P&I Club?” he asked.
The BMIP currently operates with a total corpus of
about $1.5 billion, comprising a $1.4 billion sovereign backstop guarantee from
the Union Government and ₹950 crore contributed by 21 participating
underwriters as the first layer of risk coverage.
Prusty said the
government would fully support any legislative changes required to accommodate
a mutual insurance structure compatible with international standards. “I am
mindful of the legislative requirements, which we will fully support if there
is a need to factor mutuality and redefine the insurance business under the
Insurance Act. We can go ahead with that and make it compatible with
international standards and regulations,” he said.
The BMIP was created to strengthen India’s maritime
insurance resilience amid growing geopolitical uncertainties, sanctions regimes
and disruptions affecting global trade routes. Prusty noted that nearly 95 per
cent of Indian shipping tonnage currently relies on P&I cover provided by
IG Clubs, exposing shipowners to rising insurance costs during periods of
geopolitical tension.
He highlighted that sanctions-related risks have led
to premium increases of up to 200 per cent for some Indian vessels, underlining
the need for greater domestic insurance capacity.
While emphasising
that international compliance standards must be maintained, Prusty said India
should work towards creating a credible domestic P&I network that
complements existing global arrangements and reduces excessive dependence on
foreign insurers.
Given the
challenges involved in establishing a full-fledged mutual P&I Club, he
suggested that India could initially introduce domestic insurance products
incorporating P&I coverage and gradually build expertise, underwriting
capacity and risk-sharing networks before moving towards a larger domestic
P&I framework. “Once we develop
the product, bring in more players, subscribe it, get the risks covered, then
we can build our own network,” he added.