Narayan argued that the
existing concession framework limits the time available for operators to
recover their investments and upgrade facilities. Developing a port can take
several years, followed by a period of operational stabilisation, leaving a
relatively short window for operators to maximiseutilisation and generate
returns before their contracts expire.
Under the proposed model, the government would retain ownership of the
underlying port infrastructure while partnering with private operators through
longer-term joint ventures. Performance would be assessed against agreed key
performance indicators (KPIs), providing greater certainty for investors and
encouraging continuous improvements in operational efficiency. DP World has already invested around US$3
billion in India over three decades and has pledged an additional US$5 billion
to expand its ports, rail and logistics network. The company operates five
container terminals in India, with a combined annual handling capacity of
approximately six million TEUs.
Narayan also highlighted the importance of improving connectivity
between ports and inland markets through railways, road networks and integrated
logistics facilities. He argued that India should prioritise its role as a
gateway for the country’s exports and imports rather than focusing primarily on
transshipment traffic. The proposed
Vadhavan Port in Maharashtra is among the major projects attracting DP World’s
interest. The company is exploring opportunities to expand its participation in
India’s port infrastructure while strengthening connections between domestic
manufacturers and international markets.
The call for a revised partnership framework comes as several existing
port-terminal concessions approach expiry and India considers ways to attract
more long-term private investment. A shift towards longer-duration joint
ventures could help provide greater investment certainty, support technology
adoption and encourage operators to continue upgrading port facilities.
For India’s maritime sector, the debate highlights the need to balance public ownership, private-sector participation and long-term infrastructure development to improve port efficiency and strengthen the country’s position in global trade.