In a representation
to the Secretary, Ministry of Ports,
Shipping and Waterways, RCCI has sought immediate intervention over the
disruption involving empty-container yards at Mundra Port. The representation,
submitted by RCCI Vice-President Parth
P. Ganatra, highlights the growing difficulties being faced by the
export-import community following the ongoing standoff between Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Ltd
(APSEZ) and empty-container yard operators and associated transport service
providers. The immediate trigger for
the disruption was APSEZ’s decision to change the existing system for handling
empty EXIM containers at Mundra. From September 1, shipping lines were required
to nominate empty containers to designated facilities within the Mundra
Port/SEZ area, effectively freezing the use of external empty-yard codes. APSEZ has maintained that the move is aimed at improving safety and
security, reducing road congestion, improving truck turnaround times and
strengthening operational efficiency. The port operator has subsequently
announced a dedicated Empty Container Yard with integrated warehousing,
covering storage, inspection, maintenance and movement of empty containers to
exporters and CFSs. However, the change has met strong resistance from
empty-container depot operators and transporters, who suspended operations.
Container transport operators subsequently joined the protest, bringing another
important component of the landside logistics chain under pressure. According
to industry estimates cited in recent reports, around 5,000 containers a day have been held up, while
approximately 1,500 container transporters have reportedly stopped movements. The disruption is particularly significant
because empty containers are an essential link between shipping lines,
exporters, transporters, container depots and port terminals. Exporters depend
on timely availability of empty equipment for factory stuffing, while import
containers need to be returned promptly after cargo is discharged. A customer advisory issued by CMA CGM noted that empty-container
release for factory stuffing of export shipments and gate-in of empty import
containers at affected yards had become temporarily unavailable following the
APSEZ directive. The carrier advised customers to review their container pickup
and movement plans.
The impact is therefore extending beyond the depot
operators themselves. Exporters risk
missing vessel cut-offs, cargo rollovers, additional transportation costs,
detention and other charges, while freight forwarders and transporters face
uncertainty over equipment availability and movement. The Rajkot Chamber has expressed
particular concern because exporters in the region are already operating in a
difficult international trade environment, marked by high freight rates,
equipment shortages and uncertainty across global shipping routes.
The Chamber’s
representation points out that exporters have already been confronting
challenges relating to container availability, delays and the smooth movement
of export cargo. Any prolonged disruption in container logistics at Mundra
could therefore further aggravate the difficulties faced by businesses
dependent on the port. RCCI has consequently appealed to the Central Government
to take immediate steps to resolve the
impasse and ensure uninterrupted movement of empty containers, so that
exporters and importers are not forced to bear the consequences of a dispute
over which they have little control. Meanwhile, APSEZ has proceeded with its new dedicated Empty Container
Yard at Mundra. According to the company, Mundra handles approximately 1.6
million TEUs of empty containers annually, while the port accounts for
nearly 35% of India’s container trade. APSEZ said the new facility is
intended to provide an integrated solution covering the empty-container
lifecycle and reduce unnecessary container movements. The development, however, has not by
itself resolved the broader dispute. Recent industry reporting indicates that
the standoff between APSEZ and the external depot and transport community has
continued, with concerns increasingly shifting towards the effect on exporters,
importers and freight forwarders.
Mundra is one of India’s most important gateways for
containerised international trade, making the smooth functioning of its
landside logistics ecosystem crucial for exporters across Gujarat and beyond. For
the trade community, the immediate priority is not merely where empty
containers are stored, but whether
exporters can obtain the right equipment on time, move laden containers to the
terminal before vessel cut-offs and complete their shipments without additional
disruption or costs. With the
dispute now stretching into its second week, the Rajkot Chamber’s intervention
adds to the growing calls from trade and logistics stakeholders for a swift, practical and mutually acceptable
resolution. The latest
developments suggest that while Mundra Port’s core vessel and terminal
operations continue, the empty-container
logistics chain remains under significant strain. The longer the impasse
continues, the greater the risk that operational disruption will translate into
higher costs and shipment delays for India’s EXIM community.